Wednesday, 8 February 2012

From “Great Expectations” to “Oliver Twist”, one of the best known authors of English literature was celebrated Tuesday -- 200 years after his birth. BBC was at his childhood home in Portsmouth for the occasion.

“Today the street outside was crowded with well-wishers at the first in a series of celebrations which traced his career.”

A career that included the novel “A Christmas Carol” with its timeless characters Ebenezer Scrooge and Tiny Tim.
 Britain’s Telegraph saw Prince Charles lay a wreath Tuesday at Dickens’ grave in Westminster Abbey, while actor Ralph Fiennes read from his novel “Bleak House”.

“I want’s to tell him that I’m as poor as him now and have come there to be laid along with him. By and by Joe, bye and bye.”

But while Dickens the writer is still highly regarded, 
ABC Australia found that not everyone holds Dickens the man in such esteem -- the outlet spoke with a Dickens expert from the New South Wales state library.
“He was really quite appalling the way he treated his wife.  I think he did have a lot of hang ups and problems but I don’t think that that really matters when we look at the books.
The Guardian celebrated the birthday by hypothetically asking Dickens how he would cope in the modern world.
“Film producers will be calling on your mobile phone – but you will be wary, because you have always had to protect yourself from suppliants and admirers. Could you give up your famous quill pen and ink to toy with a computer? I guess you could.”
And there was good news for Dickens fans in London, as Euronews found.
“After a two month refurbishment the Charles Dickens museum in London has reopened its doors. The former Dickens’ house has the world’s most important Dickens’ collection with over 100,000 items.”
But even if you're not an avid reader Dickens can still be enjoyed. IMDb credit the author with inspiring 326 feature length titles.

Thursday, 19 January 2012

Against the Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement


ACTA. Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement.

The name is misleading. The original idea of ACTA is to internationally protect intellectual property. It’s supposed to help prevent product & trademark counterfeiting like fake copies of expensive goods – misusing trademarks, like using a well known car brand on tampons, for example making "General Motors" tampons.

It will safeguard research investments and development of products, e.g. medical patents or pharmaceutical products. It’s also supposed to support artists and journalists and allow them to produce higher quality work , and internationally harmonize Copyright laws. Sounds great! Doesn’t it?

But there’s a twist.
The Oxford English Dictionary defines a counterfeit as: “a fraudulent imitation of something else”. But when a file is copied on the internet it is exactly the same as the original, not an imitation. And it is not stolen since the original is not removed. The information is simply being shared free of charge. So counterfeiting has nothing to do with it. 
Let us explain.
“Intellectual property” is never really defined within ACTA. It could mean trademarks, or it could mean any idea or information which later could be copyrighted, restricted and criminalized. This will have a tremendous effect on the internet as we know it.

The actual ACTA text covers a huge range of topics, and is very complex and hard to grasp. So we will explain what happens on the internet in a hypothetical real world analogy.

Imagine paying for a cookery course. During this course you learn how to cook some really tasty fried chicken. Then you return home and teach the recipe to your wife. But here’s the catch: according to ACTA, you are now both criminals, since you shared that information for free when only YOU had paid to learn it.

The ACTA regulations are clear – when you’re suspected of sharing copyrighted information, depending on the country you live in, then your access to any kind of courses will be blocked, you will be fined or send directly to prison.

But surely no-one would find out that you shared the knowledge of the secret fried chicken in private at home? And you’re right, under current law no-one would. But ACTA deals with this through excessive surveillance. All your communication will be monitored, and not only yours. Your family, your friends, they 'll all be observed, just in case. But you don’t need privacy, civil rights or liberties, because you have nothing to hide, do you?

Now that you know the principle, let’s see how it will be applied on the internet when ACTA comes into effect.

You can imagine your internet connection like a conveyor belt running in two directions. Along the conveyor belt, packets of data are coming in and going out of your computer. Under ACTA, ISPs – the companies you pay for access to the internet – will be forced to open up and inspect every single data package you send or receive to look for copyrighted information. Send or receive copyrighted info several times and you could be disconnected from the internet or face criminal charges. That means if you send an mp3 to your friend through an instant messenger, upload a video of a party which played copyrighted music, or quote a copyrighted newspaper article in an email… You’re gone. That’s it. As if that wasn’t enough, the information about the news article you sent via email will be sent to the publisher, and based on their claims you could be fined or sent to prison.

ISPs will also be required to constantly check that no copyrighted material or links to copyrighted material are found anywhere on their servers. This will be fatal for sites that hold any kind of user-generated content, like music, pictures or video. How could Youtube or Twitter work under a law like that? So the internet as we know it is on the brink of destruction.

But at least you’d think that the money from all these lawsuits would benefit creative people. But musicians, writers, movie makers, journalists, software developers and researchers also lose, because they are now held by the same rules. Protected ideas now can’t be reused, refined or developed any further. Even parts of sentences could be protected and made restricted by copyright. The whole agreement only benefits a small part of the industry, the so-called “content mafia” – media publishing companies like the RIAA and the MPAA, who have long tried to solve the “internet problem” that threatens their obsolete business model. ACTA is the result of their lobbying within the governments that participate in the negotiations.

Latest leaks indicate that techniques that bypass the planned content filter and blocking infrastructure will also be illegal.

And the worst thing? It's all done in secret. If you are European, it’s even done by people who haven't even been elected by the public. You've already seen where this is heading on YouTube. Videos are unavailable in certain geographical areas.

This obsessive copy-protection is also a great tool for information suppression. Once all the internet filters and blocking techniques are in place, virtually all information tagged as copyright could be suppressed. Maybe your critical blog or twitter account, or the video you made about rigged elections and environmental catastrophes, or even the pictures of your kittens. Ok, maybe not your kittens.  Not unless you painted a Coca-Cola logo onto their fur.

This all sounds unbelievable for everyone who’s had even a small glimpse of how the net works, but remember, those who work on the Agreement might not have any clue what the internet is about. And once the treaty is signed, their rules will have to be implemented. The consequences we have to deal with are:

 • internet censorship
 • restricted freedom of speech
 • loss of Net Neutrality due to the restriction of the use of certain protocols
 • total surveillance of all your online activities
 • loss of freedoms and restriction of civil rights
 • punishment (like losing your internet access)

And we will gain:
nothing

The time to act for the internet is now. Google ACTA. Load your tweets and Photoshops, let it be known that no-one messes with the Internet, and take it to the streets.

Stop the Kraken.




Wednesday, 23 November 2011

All about thanksgiving


More...

Before and after Spanish election.

 
Zapatero's ending, Rajoy's beginning....




Spain has turned blue, the color of conservative party Partido Popular, after a crushing victory over the ruling socialist party PSOE in the regional and municipal elections that took place Sunday. The spirits of both political parties’ leaders couldn’t be more different after learning the results. JOSE LUIS RODRIGUEZ ZAPATERO, PSOE: It was reasonable to expect that the socialist ruling party would be punished today by the people. We understand these results and we take them into account. REPORTER: Meanwhile, at the Popular Party headquarters, the mood was understandably more jubilant. MARIANO RAJOY, PARTIDO POPULAR: Today is a beautiful day for our party. We have reported the best result in our history in a regional election; the best. El Mundo reports socialist Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero has been punished for his handling of Spain’s financial crisis so severely -- that the question in the air is whether he will even be able to finish his term. The 'populars' have erased the socialists from the map. The figures speak for themselves. It was more than a 2,000,000-vote of difference ... The PSOE ... has bled in vote numbers, losing more than a million and a half votes. Motivated by the victory, Partido Popular leader Mariano Rajoy is asking to move up the general elections -- claiming the current government doesn’t have the support of the people. But El Pais thinks Partido Popular is all talk -- and no action. The writer suggests the conservatives present a vote of censure for the socialist party. The idea remains the same: to maintain the pressure and wait for the PSOE to fall under its own weight; sunk by dreadful results, a likely internal crisis and an economic situation that shows no signs of immediate improvement. Yet Iñaki Gabilondo, a well-known journalist in Spain, suggests the Popular Party’s victory in the general elections is imminent. But he points out the ‘populares’ won’t be able to ‘just wait’ much longer. The time to come smells so much of ‘populares time’ that from now until March or October they won’t be able to go on just playing the ‘waiting or PSOE criticism game.’ They now have to start giving hope to this country. Somebody needs to give hope to this country. And it seems it’s the ‘populares’ turn. For some, the elections reflected the people’s voice and the true democracy demanded by last week’s protesters. But Sky News reports the defeat of the ruling Socialist Party wasn’t enough to disperse the young people fed up with the country’s 45% youth unemployment rate. Spain’s problems aren’t going away. 40% of its young people are out of work and fears remain the country will be the next in the Eurozone to need a bailout. The protesters aren’t moving either, they voted to keep their camps in place until next weekend. The challenge now facing Mr. Zapatero is to rebuild confidence both in the economy and in his government. 'Like' Newsy on Facebook for updates in your newsfeed. Get more multisource video news analysis from Newsy Transcirpt by Newsy